1) TA is just part of story. As to me, TA is much more rigid than FA. The destination is the same.

 

2) Maths and programming provide more rooms and convenience. It is still doubtful whether the complex, out of the understanding of human beings, go beyond the classical ones, finely. Or if there are many so clever persons in the world. TA already fills the arsenal of weapon a lot, much unexplained and little explained. Maths and programming are useless without basic understanding for the user.

 

3)Something is unavoidable whichever way to choose.

Tharp says:

 

1)No more than 5 degrees of freedom in one system.

 

2)Bet more after win and less after loss.

 

3)Enter-- Add stops-- Add commissions-- Add exit.

 

4) Observing the entrance, above 55 percents, time structure 1-5 days.

 

5)The more we understand the real nature of our concept, the less historical testing we will have to go.

 

6)Tight the initial stops and do more io streams.

 

7)Systems could be improved by adding independent ( time series independent I suppose) together and verified in independent markets.

 

 

We trade nothing but our beliefs of the markets and understanding of life. Just remind myself.